USPTO serial 74345854
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Carleton Place Ontario, CA
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cosmetics and perfumery; namely, lipstick, rouge, eye-shadow, blush, face powder, foundation eyeliner, mascara, lip liner, nail polish, skin protectant, perfumes colognes, eau du toilet, eau du parfum, perfume oil, perfume spray, body lotion, body cream, facial soap, body soap, shampoo, conditioner, hair gel, mousse, deodorant, hand lotion | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 1997 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 1994 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |