USPTO serial 74345927
RAP RAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SARAI, BALDEV
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RAP RAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James W. McKee
JAMES W MCKEE1100 SUPERIOR AVE STE 700CLEVELAND, OH 44114-2214UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | video tapes, audio and audio-visual tapes and motion picture film featuring animated cartoons, actors and actresses; recording apparatus, namely video cassette recorders for video tapes, audio and audio visual tape recorders, audio cassette recorders, compact disk recorders, audio and audio-visual tapes, audio and video cassettes, compact disks, and phonograph records featuring animated cartoons, actors and actresses | ABANDONED | — |
| 028 | toys and games, namely board games including playing pieces and game tokens and video game cartridges, and computer activated inter-active video games and computer games consisting of visual display units, processing units, keyboards, joy sticks and mouses | ABANDONED | — |
| 038 | television broadcasting services | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | entertainment services in the nature of a television series, and production and distribution of motion picture films | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Nevada Ranch Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Nevada Ranch Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named RAP RAT
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 1996 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 7, 1996 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 15, 1996 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 1996 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 14, 1995 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 1995 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 15, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 23, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 22, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 7, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 14, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 11, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |