USPTO serial 74345967
STACKMAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JUDGE, CONNIE M.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STACKMAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DIANELLA, WESTERN AUSTRALIA 6062, AU
DIANELLA, WESTERN AUSTRALIA 6062, AU
DIANELLA, WESTERN AUSTRALIA 6062, AU
DIANELLA, WESTERN AUSTRALIA 6062, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kimberley Sodoma
213 GORDON RDBROCKPORT, NY 14420UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | storage systems; namely, storage shelving, storage racks, storage dividers and parts therefor for supporting articles of linen, fabric and clothing in a pile | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GENERO, GAIL ANN
- Other trademarks owned by GENERO, GAIL ANN
- Other trademarks owned by GENERO, CLAUDE PAUL
- Other trademarks owned by GENERO, CLAUDE PAUL
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named STACKMAN
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 1998 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 12, 1998 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 1997 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 12, 1997 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 1997 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 1997 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 16, 1996 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 1996 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 1996 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 8, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 16, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 14, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 6, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 5, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 1994 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 1, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 6, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 7, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |