USPTO serial 74346233
BOSS GOLF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 26, 2002
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BOSS GOLF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
NEW YORK, NY
HUGO BOSS TRADE MARKS MANAGEMENT GMBH & CO. KG
Metzingen, DE
Other trademarks owned by HUGO BOSS TRADE MARKS MANAGEMENT GMBH & CO. KG
NEW YORK, NY
Compton, CA
METZINGEN, DE
BALTIMORE, MD
METZINGEN, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Wendy L. Addiss
LISA W ROSAYA BAKER & MCKENZIE LLP1114 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-7703UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | shirts, sport shirts, polo knit shirts, knit shirts, sport knit shirts, belts and headwear | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 1, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AMBRA INC.
- Other trademarks owned by HUGO BOSS TRADE MARKS MANAGEMENT GMBH & CO. KG
- Other trademarks owned by AMBRA INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Brookhurst, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by HUGO BOSS AG
- Other trademarks owned by I.C. ISAACS & COMPANY L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by HUGO BOSS AG
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named BOSS GOLF
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 4, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 19, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 2, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 20, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 13, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 24, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 20, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 4, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 3, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 1993 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 7, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 1993 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |