Drawing for MIST'R CRISP'R

USPTO serial 74347113

MIST'R CRISP'R

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 607
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CATALDO, PETER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MIST'R CRISP'R?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007vegetable crisper; namely, battery/electric household device used to keep fruits and vegetables fresh by intermittent spraying with waterABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 3, 1995IUFFUSE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES
Aug 3, 1995EX1MSOU EXTENSION 1 DENIAL LETTER MAILED
Aug 3, 1995EX1DSOU EXTENSION 1 DENIAL LETTER PREPARED
May 16, 1995ABN7ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT
May 5, 1995IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
May 5, 1995EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Nov 15, 1994NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 23, 1994PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 22, 1994NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 29, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 3, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 22, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 1993ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Jul 26, 1993ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Jul 26, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 23, 1993ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Jul 12, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 1, 1993CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Jun 30, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 24, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 9, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 24, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance