USPTO serial 74347811
SUPER VALUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HINES, CARYN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUPER VALUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David L. Sigalow
DAVID L SIGALOW GRIMES & BATTERSBYTHREE LANDMARK SQ STE 405P O BOX 1311STAMFORD, CT 06904-1311Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 034 | cigars, little cigars, pipe tobacco, roll-your-own cigarette tobacco | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 1997 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 21, 1997 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 23, 1996 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 1995 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 24, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 1994 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 2, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |