USPTO serial 74347893
VIDEO BLASTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2074104Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 24, 1997
- Examiner
- LE, MARGARET
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with VIDEO BLASTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SG
SG
SG
Milpitas, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GRETCHEN R. STROUD,
GRETCHEN R STROUD COOLEY GODWARD LLPFIVE PALO ALTO SQ 4TH FL3000 EL CAMINO REALPALO ALTO, CA 94306-2155Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware and computer operating software programs; and computer application software programs for creating multimedia presentations that synchronize audio output with video and graphics displayed on a computer digital video display; and user reference manual therefor sold as a unit | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 10, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CREATIVE TECHNOLOGY LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by CREATIVE TECHNOLOGY LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by CREATIVE TECHNOLOGY LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by CREATIVE LABS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named VIDEO BLASTER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2008 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 23, 2003 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 1997 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 5, 1997 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 17, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 1997 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 6, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 14, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 12, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 20, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 20, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 1994 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 15, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 15, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 1993 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |