USPTO serial 74348379
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
ACAPULCO, GUERRERO, MX
DAMIAN, FRANCISCO ADEODATO ALVAREZ
CANCUN, QUINTANA ROO, MX
Other trademarks owned by DAMIAN, FRANCISCO ADEODATO ALVAREZ
MARTINEZ, VILMA EDITH CARDENAS
GUERRERO, MX
MARTINEZ, VILMA EDITH CARDENAS
Acapulco, Guerrero, MX
MARTINEZ, VILMA EDITH CARDENAS
GUERRERO, MX
DAMIAN, FRANCISCO ADEODATO ALVAREZ
CANCUN, QUINTANA ROO, MX
Other trademarks owned by DAMIAN, FRANCISCO ADEODATO ALVAREZ
ACAPULCO, GUERRERO, MX
ACAPULCO, GUERRERO, MX
ACAPULCO, GUERRERO, MX
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | restaurant services; canteen services; hotel services; and campground services, namely, providing campground facilities | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2004 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 8, 1997 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 8, 1997 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 30, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |