USPTO serial 74348848
ULTRA-FOIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KREBS, CATHERINE K.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ULTRA-FOIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert A. Lucas
ROBERT A LUCAS LUCAS HOLCOMB & MEDREAEASTON COURT300 E 90TH DRMERRILLVILLE, IN 46410Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | reflective insulation for use in residential, commercial and industrial buildings, and reflective insulation for use in packing | ABANDONED | Feb 21, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 1994 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 25, 1994 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 25, 1994 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 10, 1994 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 23, 1994 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 21, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 30, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 17, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |