Drawing for SMARTMESSAGING

USPTO serial 74349435

SMARTMESSAGING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1840169Status 900
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 14, 1994
Examiner
BURKE, MICHAEL J.
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMARTMESSAGING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038paging servicesEXPIREDJan 11, 1993

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 7, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
May 15, 2006CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9
Nov 18, 2002CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Nov 18, 2002CANDCANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999
Mar 15, 2002PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Feb 8, 20018.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Feb 8, 2001PRANPOST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED
Oct 2, 2000815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED
Oct 2, 2000XXXXPOST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION
Jun 14, 1994R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Mar 23, 1994CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER
Feb 18, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 19, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 21, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 20, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 1, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance