USPTO serial 74350676
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
M-I Drilling Fluids Company (M-I)
Houston, TX
M-I Drilling Fluids Company (M-I)
Houston, TX
M-I Drilling Fluids Company (M-I)
Houston, TX
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carter J. White
Carter J. White M-I L.L.C.5950 North Course DriveLegal Dept - TrademarksHouston, TX 77072| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | petroleum industry equipment; namely, fluids processing (solids control) equipment; namely, shakers, desanders, desilters, hydroclone packages; namely, several hydroclones connected by piping and mounted on a skid, mud cleaners; namely, hydroclones used in conjunction with a shaker all of which is mounted on a skid, centrifuges and fluids processing systems; namely, an integrated, tailor made, system consisting of two or more primary shakers, a desander, a desilter, a hydroclone package, a mud cleaner, a centrifuge, a degasser and associated piping and tanks mounted on a skid and pressure control equipment; namely, chokes, degassers, centrifugal degassers, H2S mud gas separators, dual mud gas separators for horizontal drilling, and total gas containment systems; namely, integrated degasser and H2S mud gas separator with associated valves and piping mounted on either a skid or a trailer | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 1987 |
| 009 | petroleum industry equipment; namely, rig instrumentation equipment; namely, a computerized data acquisition units showing drilling variables in different displays, making a permanent record of the same and transmitting the same to or from remote locations; micro-processor controlled rig-floor monitors which monitor and display various drilling functions with alarms; electronic pit volume totalizers and return flow sensors; drilling recorders; and straight hole tools; namely, mechanical inclinometer | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 1987 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 25, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2001 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 25, 1994 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 2, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 1, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 18, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 12, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 1, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |