USPTO serial 74350724
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Rougemont (Quebec), CA
Rougemont, Quebec, J0L 1MO, CA
Rougemont (Quebec), CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
STEPHEN J JEFFRIES HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP2099 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | fruit juice and fruit drinks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 5, 1997 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2005 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 28, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 1998 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 3, 1997 | CNSR | ALLOWED SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 31, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 1997 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 9, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 1996 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 30, 1996 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 1996 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 8, 1996 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 1996 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 1995 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 5, 1995 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 9, 1995 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 1994 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 9, 1994 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 10, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 15, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 14, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 17, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 10, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |