USPTO serial 74352048
VITAL CARE VITAMIN CLASSICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRUN, JEAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VITAL CARE VITAMIN CLASSICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | hair care products; namely, shampoo, hair spray, styling mousse, styling gel, hair spritzer, hot oils, conditioners, spray on gels, and non-medicated protein conditioners, and skin care products; namely, skin moisturizers, facial moisturizers, moisturizing masques, facial toners, facial treatments, facial gelees, facial scrubs, cleansing milks, and facial masques | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 1996 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 3, 1995 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 26, 1994 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 18, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 16, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 7, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |