USPTO serial 74352584
WAREHOUSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIM, RICHARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WAREHOUSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Tecoma, Victoria, AU
Tecoma, Victoria, AU
Surrey Hills, Victoria, AU
Surrey Hills, Victoria, AU
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | motion picture films featuring music and dancing; video and audio cassettes featuring dance music; compact discs featuring dance music; and phonorecords and sound recordings featuring dance music | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | entertainment services, namely, production and wholesale distribution of motion picture films | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WALKER, MARCUS TASMAN
- Other trademarks owned by WALKER, MARCUS TASMAN
- Other trademarks owned by WALKER, DONALD STUART
- Other trademarks owned by WALKER, DONALD STUART
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named WAREHOUSE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 16, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 11, 1998 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 11, 1998 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 9, 1998 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 23, 1998 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 24, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 20, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 6, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 5, 1998 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Dec 4, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 1993 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |