USPTO serial 74354041
ELENA'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 17, 1995
- Examiner
- MIRMAN, DONNA
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ELENA'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Houlihan's Culinary Traditions, Ltd.
Auburn Hills, MI
Other trademarks owned by Houlihan's Culinary Traditions, Ltd.
Houlihan's Culinary Traditions, Ltd.
Auburn Hills, MI
Other trademarks owned by Houlihan's Culinary Traditions, Ltd.
Houlihan's Culinary Traditions, Ltd.
Auburn Hills, MI
Other trademarks owned by Houlihan's Culinary Traditions, Ltd.
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | pastas; tomato-based pasta sauces; pasta sauces made with edible oils; tomato and herb-based sauces used as a dip | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 10, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Houlihan's Culinary Traditions, Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Houlihan's Culinary Traditions, Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Houlihan's Culinary Traditions, Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named ELENA'S
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 17, 2006 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 17, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 18, 2001 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 17, 2001 | PR23 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Jul 17, 2001 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| May 18, 2001 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 1995 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 25, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 23, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 19, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 27, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 1994 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 1994 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 25, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |