USPTO serial 74354825
SWEET NOTHINGS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1928882Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 24, 1995
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SWEET NOTHINGS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Junction City, OR
Junction City, OR
Junction City, OR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES W. CLEMENT
JAMES W CLEMENT120 S RIVERSIDE PLZ22ND FLCHICAGO, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | dairy desserts (namely, ice cream, ice milk, frozen yogurt and sherbet); sorbet,and flavored ices; bakery products, namely pies, cakes, sweet rolls, coffee cakes, doughnuts, danish rolls and cookies; corn and wheat based snack foods and cereal based snack foods | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 1997 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Feb 27, 1997 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Dec 10, 1996 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Jun 7, 1996 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Oct 24, 1995 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 1, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 30, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 9, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 6, 1995 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 22, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 15, 1994 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 5, 1994 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 28, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 23, 1993 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |