USPTO serial 74355166
TIVOLI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2814393Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 17, 2004
- Examiner
- RUPP, TERRY
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TIVOLI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Surabaya 60162, ID
Surabaya 60162, ID
Surabaya 60162, ID
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Catherine J. Holland
Catherine J. Holland Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP2040 Main Street, 14th FloorIrvine, CA 92614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | non-electric autoclaves/pressure cookers, cooking pots, non-electric deep fryers, frying pans, [non-electric kettles,] pot lids, pots, saucepans, stew pans, [thermally insulated containers for food, vacuum bottles], non-electric woks and non-electric griddles,[ flasks, non-electric cooking grills, non-electric kitchen mixers, non-electric trouser presses, ironing boards] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2026 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 17, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2014 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2014 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 12, 2014 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 12, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 28, 2014 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2014 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 21, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 13, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Dec 13, 2003 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2003 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 18, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 2, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 1, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 1, 2002 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 27, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 9, 1995 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 8, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 22, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 9, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 1994 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 14, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 1994 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 15, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 4, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |