USPTO serial 74355389
OUTBACK GEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BONNET, ODETTE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OUTBACK GEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
West Chester, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Manny D. Pokotilow
MANNY D POKOTILOW CAESAR, RIVISE, BERNSTEIN, COHEN, ET AL12TH FL SEVEN PENN CTR1635 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2212Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing; namely, pants, jackets, skirts, slacks, shirts and blouses | ABANDONED | Apr 23, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 1995 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 18, 1994 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 18, 1994 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Apr 18, 1994 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 1994 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 11, 1994 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 23, 1994 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 27, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 29, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 1993 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 9, 1993 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 14, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 5, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |