USPTO serial 74359399
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew Hartman
ANDREW HARTMAN WILLIAN BRINKS OLDS HOFER GILSON & LIONEP O BOX 10395CHICAGO, IL 60610UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | health club services; education services, namely conducting programs, demonstrations, and workshops in the field of nutrition; instruction in the field of nutrition; entertainment in the nature of live cooking and nutrition demonstrations and periodic cooking and nutrition shows distributed over radio and television; production and distribution of live performances, television and radio programs, and sound recordings, all in the field of cooking and nutrition | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 1997 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 5, 1995 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 21, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 15, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 12, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 1, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |