USPTO serial 74362467
REUSE ENGINEERING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BURKE, MICHAEL J.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with REUSE ENGINEERING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marvin N. Benn
MARVIN N BENN HAMMAN & BENN25 E WASHINGTON ST STE 600CHICAGO, IL 60602UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | providing lectures, seminars and training in the field of computers, particularly in areas of information repositories and defining systems development methods with the use of case tools and supporting high-speed, joint and rapid application development, and new approaches, such as object-oriented techniques, and including the use of domain analysis | ABANDONED | Jan 11, 1993 |
| 042 | consulting services in the field of computers, particularly in the areas of information repositories and defining systems development methods with the use of case tools and supporting high-speed, joint and rapid application development, and new approaches, such as object-oriented techniques, and including the use of domain analysis | ABANDONED | Jan 11, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 24, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |