USPTO serial 74364306
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Carrollton, TX
Dallas, TX
Carrollton, TX
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James O. Dixon
JAMES O DIXON CRUTSINGER & BOOTH1000 THANKSGIVING TWR1601 ELM STDALLAS, TX 75201| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | dinnerware of stoneware; namely, plates, cups, saucers, serving platters, and serving bowls | ABANDONED | Jun 1, 1993 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 1996 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 13, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 13, 1996 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 21, 1995 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 13, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 11, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 18, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 14, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 1993 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 16, 1993 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 15, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |