USPTO serial 74365696
GRAPHITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GRAPHITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Ville Saint-Laurent, Quebec, H4R 2E9, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PAUL W KRUSE
PAUL W KRUSE CUSHMAN DAARBY & CUSHMAN1100 NEW YORK AVE 9TH FLWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3918UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | EYEWEAR, NAMELY , SUNGLASSES, SPECTACLE, SUNGLASS PART AND EYEWEAR PARTS, NAMELY, REPLACEMENT LENSES, EAR STEM, FRAMES, NOSE PIECES; AND CASES ADAPTED FOR SUNGLASSES OR EYEWEAR | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |