Drawing for BIG DOGS

USPTO serial 74366488

BIG DOGS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
TAYLOR, JYLL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIG DOGS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kurt Koenig

Kurt Koenig Koenig & AssociatesPO Box 1140Summerland, CA 93067UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009life saving apparatus; namely, life jackets and vests; prerecorded video discs; prerecorded audio cassettes; prerecorded compact discs; radios; audio cassette players; and animated motion picture filmsABANDONED
024bedsheets, bedspreads, comforters, duvet covers, dust ruffles, shams and pillow casesABANDONED
028hand-held electronic games, computer game tapes, programs, cartridges and cassettes, ski bindings and parts thereofABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 1, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 1, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
May 14, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Mar 25, 1999ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 21, 1998DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Jun 24, 1998EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jun 15, 1998DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
May 21, 1998EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Dec 9, 1997NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 16, 1997OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Sep 16, 1997OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999
May 24, 1996OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
May 24, 1996OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999
Mar 20, 1995OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Mar 20, 1995OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Nov 30, 1994ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Nov 1, 1994PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 30, 1994NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 17, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 12, 1994CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Apr 19, 1994CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 28, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 13, 1993UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
Jul 26, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 28, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 24, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance