USPTO serial 74367271
GREAT VALUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2594452Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 16, 2002
- Examiner
- BENZMILLER, ANDREW
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GREAT VALUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bentonville, AR
Bentonville, AR
Toronto, Ontario M4T 2S7, CA
Toronto, Ontario M4T 2S7, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | laundry products, namely, bleaching preparations, dryer sheets, fabric softeners for domestic use and stain removers [ ; hair care products, namely, shampoos, conditioners, hair sprays, styling gels and mousses, hair dyes and rinses; skin creams and lotions; petroleum jelly for cosmetic uses; personal soaps; personal deodorants; mouth wash; breath fresheners and toothpaste ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 7, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by LOBLAWS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LOBLAWS INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named GREAT VALUE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 5, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2008 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Aug 30, 2008 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jul 17, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 13, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 20, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 20, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 8, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 14, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 18, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 22, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 24, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 30, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 28, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 15, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 15, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 1997 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 1995 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 29, 1995 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 28, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |