Drawing for SMART CUISINE

USPTO serial 74372887

SMART CUISINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMART CUISINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John Friedl

JOHN FRIEDL HONIGMAN MILLER SCHWARTZ AND COHN2290 FIRST NATIONAL BLDGDETROIT, MI 48226UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030prepared entrees comprised primarily of rice, pasta and/or processed grains, for breakfast, lunch and dinnerABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 17, 1993ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION
Nov 23, 1993PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 22, 1993NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 6, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 19, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 28, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 9, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 25, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance