USPTO serial 74372887
SMART CUISINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMART CUISINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Henderson, NV
Henderson, NV
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Friedl
JOHN FRIEDL HONIGMAN MILLER SCHWARTZ AND COHN2290 FIRST NATIONAL BLDGDETROIT, MI 48226UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | prepared entrees comprised primarily of rice, pasta and/or processed grains, for breakfast, lunch and dinner | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 1993 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 23, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 22, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 6, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 19, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |