USPTO serial 74378986
CAN CADDY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1876173Status 900
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 24, 1995
- Examiner
- BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CAN CADDY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William Nitkin
1320 CTR ST #300NEWTON, MA 02459UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | wire-frame, dual-channeled storage and carrier container for stacking a plurality of empty beverage cans therein | EXPIRED | Feb 9, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2019 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2001 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jan 19, 2001 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 1995 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 22, 1994 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 10, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 1994 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 8, 1994 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 8, 1994 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 27, 1994 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 6, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 1, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |