USPTO serial 74389035
AQUAFLOW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUSH, KAREN K
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AQUAFLOW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Glens Falls, NY
Glens Falls, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert A. Vanderhye
ROBERT A VANDERHYE NIXON & VANDERHYE PC1100 N GLEBE RD 8TH FLARLINGTON, VA 22201-4714UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | pollution control and wastewater treatment equipment, namely pulp and paper mill effluent treatment equipment for practicing effluent treatment processes, namely clarifiers, presses, activated sludge vessels, mechanical treatment vessels, anaerobic treatment vessels, chemical treatment vessels, sludge dewatering presses, pumps, valves, piping, and instrumentation, all sold as a unit only for use in pulp and paper mill effluent treatment equipment | ABANDONED | — |
| 037 | maintenance of pollution control and waste water treatment equipment in the pulp and paper industry; and installation of pollution control and waste water treatment equipment in the pulp and paper industry | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 1997 | EX2M | SOU EXTENSION 2 DENIAL LETTER MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 1997 | EX2D | SOU EXTENSION 2 DENIAL LETTER PREPARED | — |
| Sep 11, 1997 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 9, 1997 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 10, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 5, 1996 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 16, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 28, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 7, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |