USPTO serial 74390402
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
City of Industry, CA
City of Industry, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
M. John Carson
M JOHN CARSON ROBBINS BERLINER & CARSONFIFTH FL201 N FIGUEROA STLOS ANGELES, CA 90012-2628| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | non dairy-based topping | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 24, 1997 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 24, 1997 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 23, 1994 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 31, 1994 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 25, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 28, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 28, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |