USPTO serial 74392546
ENERGIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARMINE, F. D.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ENERGIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald C. Casey
DONALD C CASEY LOWE, PRICE, LEBLANC & BECKERSTE 30099 CANAL CTR PLZALEXANDRIA, VA 22314Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electric, electronic, signalling, sound and image transmission, data carrier and telecommunication apparatus, namely telephones, facsimile machines, remote tone dialers, smart cards, computer terminals, fiber optic cables; video apparatus, namely cameras, TV and closed circuit conferencing receivers, transmitters, screens and videophones; electronic terminals and switches for use in telecommunications, metering and monitoring apparatus for monitoring telecommunicaitons, computers and computer programs for controlling monitoring, metering and organizing the transmission, receipt and distribution of signals, telephones and telephone exhcange apparatus and cellular phones and parts therefor | ABANDONED | Mar 25, 1993 |
| 038 | telecommunication services, namely telephone services, radio communication services, television communication services, audio and video teleconferencing services, facsimile transmission services, electronic transmission of data and documents, electronic mail services, monitoring and metering services for telephones and data transmission, transmission of television pictures and providing consulting services and advice concerning the installation and operation of the telephone, radio communication, audio and video teleconferencing, facsimile transmission, electronic transmission, electronic mail, and television systems related to the aforementioned services | ABANDONED | Mar 25, 1993 |
| 042 | technical consultation in the field of the operation of telephone, radio communication, audio and video teleconferencing, facsimile transmission, electronic transmission, electronic mail and television systems | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 28, 1996 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 18, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |