Drawing for BEST CHOICE

USPTO serial 74394207

BEST CHOICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MATTHEWS, AMOS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEST CHOICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward R. Weber

EDWARD R WEBER HERZOG, CREBS & MCGHEEONE CITY CTR 24TH FL515 N 6TH STST LOUIS, MO 63101

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
002interior and exterior paints in the nature of a coatingABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 4, 1995ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION
Jun 5, 1995ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
May 2, 1995PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 31, 1995NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 10, 1995CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 16, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 19, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 28, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance