USPTO serial 74394240
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karl F. Milde, Jr.
RICHARD P VITEK MYERS BIGEL SIBLEY & SAJOVECP O BOX 37438RALEIGH, NC 27627UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | interconnect system comprising computer hardware and software for operating a PC (personal computer) workstation having an image display, a loudspeaker, a microphone and a video camera, as a video conferencing station | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 23, 1994 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2002 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 27, 2002 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 25, 2002 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 2, 1996 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 18, 1995 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 5, 1995 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 8, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 1994 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 16, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 22, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 28, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 26, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 5, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 28, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |