USPTO serial 74396124
Serial No. 74396124
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 74396124?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Pleasantville, NJ
Pleasantville, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jay K. Meadway
Roberta Jacobs-Meadway Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, L.L.C.Two Liberty Place, 50 South 16th Street22nd FloorPhiladelphia, PA 19102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | dietary aid; namely, an enzyme in tablet form for consumption in conjunction with beans and other gas causing foods for eliminating or reducing gas | ABANDONED | Oct 15, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 6, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 1995 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 19, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 15, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 23, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 22, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 11, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 10, 1994 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 4, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 25, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |