USPTO serial 74400300
TWIN DRAGON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COHEN, DARREN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TWIN DRAGON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
South San Francisco, CA
South San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisabeth Wagner
19672 STEVENS CREEK BLVD STE 205CUPERTINO, CA 95014UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | canned and dried fruit, dried mushrooms, jellies, jams, soups, dried squid, beef jerky, oils (cotton seed, sesame seed, and vegetable), and processed beans (red and mung), soybean paste | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | cookies, rice crackers, candies, rices (long, medium and short grain), teas (oolong, jasmine), noodles (dried, fresh and wet), rice vinegar, sauces (oyster and oriental style), corn syrups and flavoring syrups, tempura batter mix, and bread crumbs | ABANDONED | — |
| 032 | tropical fruit drinks | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by JFC INTERNATIONAL INC.
- Other trademarks owned by JFC INTERNATIONAL INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named TWIN DRAGON
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 1995 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 25, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 31, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 2, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 31, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 4, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 1994 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 16, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |