USPTO serial 74407272
CAE SELECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CAE SELECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert G. McMorrow
ROBERT G MCMORROW SUGHRUE, MION, ZINN, MACPEAK & SEAS2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | machine parts; namely, screen plates, screens, cylinders, drums and baskets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 23, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 3, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 1999 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |