USPTO serial 74412657
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
LYON, FR
BIODERMA SKIN ENRICHMENT PRODUCTS LIMITED
Etobicoke, Ontario M8Z 2T2, CA
Other trademarks owned by BIODERMA SKIN ENRICHMENT PRODUCTS LIMITED
BIODERMA SKIN ENRICHMENT PRODUCTS LIMITED
Etobicoke, Ontario M8Z 2T2, CA
Other trademarks owned by BIODERMA SKIN ENRICHMENT PRODUCTS LIMITED
BIODERMA SKIN ENRICHMENT PRODUCTS LIMITED
Etobicoke, Ontario M8Z 2T2, CA
Other trademarks owned by BIODERMA SKIN ENRICHMENT PRODUCTS LIMITED
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BROOKS R BRUNEAU
BROOKS R BRUNEAU MATHEWS, COLLINS, SHEPHERD & GOULD29 THANET ROAD SUITE 201PRINCETON, NJ 08540-3674UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | day and night facial cream, neck cream, hand cream, body cream, breast cream, massage cream and foot creams, skin wrinkle cream, eye area cream; non-medicated hair tonics, non-medicated facial cleansing lotion, facial peels, facial masks, facial cleansers, facial astringents for cosmetic use, eye make up remover; skin moisturizers, [bath oils, skin toners,] make-up foundations, [make-up;] skin lotions; personal deodorant; [nail care products, namely, cuticle softener, nail hardener polish; eye lash oils,] sun screen preparations; non-medicated shampoo,[non-medicated hair conditioners, hair setting and styling gels] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2011 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 24, 2006 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 17, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 7, 2001 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 20, 2001 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2001 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 8, 2000 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Nov 21, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 21, 2000 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 6, 1998 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 18, 1997 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 18, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 12, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 27, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 1996 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 30, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 21, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |