USPTO serial 74416475
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marvin N. Gordon
MARVIN N GORDON HOPGOOD, CALIMAFDE, KALILBLAUSTEIN & JUDLOWELINCOLN BLDG 60 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10165| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | communication system products, namely local area networks, computer interfaces, integrated circuits, transceivers, controllers, drivers, circuit boards, repeaters, wiring centers, network operating system software, computer software for use in configuration and diagnostic applications for local area networks; computer software for use in instructional applications for local area networks and associated computer hardware for use therewith | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 19, 1996 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 19, 1996 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 28, 1995 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 24, 1995 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 26, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 18, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 11, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 1995 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 22, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 9, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |