USPTO serial 74447584
PLAY-TECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PLAY-TECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Tai Po, N.T., HK
Tai Po, N.T., HK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard Eugene Dick
RICHARD EUGENE DICK LAW OFFICE OF DICK AND HARRIS181 W MADISON ST STE 3800CHICAGO, IL 60602UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | cassette recorders and/or players, radio transmitter and/or receiver units | ABANDONED | — |
| 011 | night lights, flashlights and reading lights | ABANDONED | — |
| 014 | clocks | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | instructional booklet for toys | ABANDONED | — |
| 020 | mirrors | ABANDONED | — |
| 028 | infant action crib toys, motorized and non-motorized construction and/or building toys comprising inter-locking pieces to form vehicles and/or robots, children's multiple activity toys, electronic educational activity toys for children, hand-held and/or table top electronic games, musical toys, toy musical instruments, soft stuffed toys, stacking toys, mechanical toys producing sound, toy vehicles, manipulative and/or three dimensional puzzles, talking toy figures | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PLAYTECH, LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by PLAYTECH, LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named PLAY-TECH
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 1998 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 4, 1997 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 1997 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 30, 1995 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 6, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 16, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 10, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 1994 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 4, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 31, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |