USPTO serial 74447889
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew Hartman
ANDREW C LYONS, PRESIDENT ALL GOOD INC1024 N BLVD STE 207OAK PARK, IL 60301UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | cereal, corn, grain, rice and wheat based snack foods | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 1997 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 10, 1997 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 10, 1997 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 27, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 13, 1996 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 8, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 24, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 20, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |