Drawing for MICROSYSTEMS WAREHOUSE

USPTO serial 74457744

MICROSYSTEMS WAREHOUSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
REIHNER, DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MICROSYSTEMS WAREHOUSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Arthur J. Jacobs

ARTHUR J JACOBS JACOBS & CONKLIN445 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042mail-order and telephone-order services in the field of computer hardware, software, peripherals, accessories, supplies, forms, books, and instructional materialsABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 30, 1997ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Oct 8, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 9, 1997CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Apr 9, 1997IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED
Feb 28, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 28, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 1995CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 27, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 25, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 1994AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Apr 11, 1994IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Apr 7, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance