USPTO serial 74458910
CYMBAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SANTOMARTINO, MARTHA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CYMBAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frank L. Politano
FRANK L POLITANO AT&T CORP900 RTE 202/206N P O BOX 7523A249BEDMINSTER, NJ 07921Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer programs for database management | ABANDONED | Jun 1, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by AT&T CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named CYMBAL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 6, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 1998 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 5, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 1998 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 1, 1997 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 1997 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 1997 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 1997 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 25, 1996 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 1996 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 1996 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 14, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 10, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 14, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 16, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |