USPTO serial 74461912
VALV-TECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHUNG, SARAH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VALV-TECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Fogelsville, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lewis F. Gould, Jr.
LEWIS F GOULD JR ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT1700 MARKET ST STE 3232PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | machine parts; namely, manual and power operated butterfly valves and dampers for use as parts in air compressors, fluid handling systems for use in mixing fluids in industrial applications, pneumatic conveyors and oil pump lines | ABANDONED | — |
| 011 | manual and power operated butterfly valves and dampers for use as parts in heat exchangers, boilers, furnaces, air handling systems for use in industry to remove pollutants, blowers for use in heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems to move air in industrial processes, heat recovery and transfer systems for use in industrial processes, water lines for use in industrial processes, ductwork systems for removal of flue gasses, and fly ash removal systems for use in industrial applications | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 20, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |