Drawing for FRESHPAK

USPTO serial 74464112

FRESHPAK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MICHOS, LESLIE BISHOP
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FRESHPAK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gregory M. Howison

GREGORY M HOWISON HIGH POINT CTRTHOMPSON & HOWISON, LLP12225 GREENVILLE AVE STE 995DALLAS, TX 75243

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016plastic bags for packaging of pet foodsABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 1, 1997ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION
Apr 29, 1996ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Mar 26, 1996PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 23, 1996NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 22, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 20, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 17, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 3, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 22, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 10, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 4, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance