USPTO serial 74468591
EASY RIDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHUNG, SARAH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EASY RIDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES H. SCHWARTZ
CHARLES H SCHWARTZ ROSTON & SCHWARTZ, PC5900 WILSHIRE BLVDSTE 1430LOS ANGELES, CA 90036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | electric powered bicycle kit consisting of an electric motor and electromechanical controls therefor and mounting brackets, all sold as a unit, for attachment to a bicycle | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 1995 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 6, 1995 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 6, 1995 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 8, 1995 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 3, 1995 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 14, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 13, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 17, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 7, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 8, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |