USPTO serial 74474677
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
ALBERTA, CA
ALBERTA, CA
Fort Sackatchewan, Alberta T8L 2P2, CA
MEMPHIS, TN
ALBERTA, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George K. Stacey
GEORGE K STACEY SMITH & NEPHEW, INC1450 BROOKS RDMEMPHIS, TN 38116UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | Antimicrobial paints for medical, dental, and industrial use | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 9, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 31, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 10, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 2, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 2, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 1, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 3, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 14, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 16, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 22, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 1998 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 9, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 1998 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |