USPTO serial 74475212
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Ehrlich
DAVID EHRLICH FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | providing sport and amusement activity facilities | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 1999 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 12, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 12, 1999 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 15, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 14, 1998 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 16, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 16, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 3, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 1998 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Feb 5, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 1998 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Dec 21, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 14, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |