USPTO serial 74476673
TUSKER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TUSKER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ivybridge, Devon PL21 0DW, GB
Ivybridge, Devon PL21 0DW, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HAROLD L NOVICK
HAROLD L NOVICK NATH & ASSOCIATES PLLC112 S W STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | protective clothing for industrial purposes; flame-retardant and heat-resistant clothing and headgear; safety equipment, namely fire blankets for smothering fires and welding blankets for safety and protection; flame retardant and protective blankets, curtains, curtaining strips, screens, shelters and tents, all being flame retardant or protective, and support frames therefor and replacement parts therefor | ABANDONED | — |
| 017 | insulation in the nature of insulating heat-retention blankets | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 11, 1998 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 1998 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 28, 1998 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 1998 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 1997 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 6, 1997 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 29, 1997 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 1997 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 6, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 7, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 13, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 16, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 4, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 12, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |