USPTO serial 74479123
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Management Computer Services, Inc.
Columbus, OH
Other trademarks owned by Management Computer Services, Inc.
REYNOLDS AND REYNOLDS COMPANY, THE
Dayton, OH
Other trademarks owned by REYNOLDS AND REYNOLDS COMPANY, THE
REYNOLDS AND REYNOLDS COMPANY, THE
Dayton, OH
Other trademarks owned by REYNOLDS AND REYNOLDS COMPANY, THE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Katherine C. Spelman
KATHERINE C SPELMAN333 MARKET STSTE 3200SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2150| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware and software for leasing access time to a computer data base in the field of automotive parts for cooperating automotive dealers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2003 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 7, 1996 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 13, 1996 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 1, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 1995 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 25, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |