USPTO serial 74485471
TREATS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUPP, TERRY
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TREATS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Ottawa, Ontario Canada K1S 4N2, CA
Ottawa, Ontario Canada K1S 4N2, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frank P. Presta
FRANK P PRESTA NIXON & VANDERHYE11TH FL901 N GLEBE RDARLINGTON, VA 22203Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | retail store services featuring baked goods, gourmet items, beverages and other similar food products | ABANDONED | Oct 22, 1986 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 2, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 2, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 2, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 1998 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 3, 1997 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 27, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 15, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 30, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 30, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |