USPTO serial 74485585
DIGITAL LIGHTWAVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2226814Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 23, 1999
- Examiner
- SHAW, THOMAS V
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DIGITAL LIGHTWAVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEFAN V STEIN
DOYLE MILLS5775 REO VISTA DRCLEARWATER, FL 33760UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electronic testing equipment, namely, telecommunication line integrity testing apparatus | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2005 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 1999 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 9, 1998 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 25, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 1998 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 18, 1998 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 9, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 3, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 30, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 1997 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 20, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 1997 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 19, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 5, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 27, 1996 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 1, 1996 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 5, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 1994 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 27, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 26, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |