USPTO serial 74486544
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PATRICK J. COYNE
PATRICK J COYNE COLLIER SHANNON RILL & SCOTTSTE 4003050 K ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20007| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | providing cooperative advertising and marketing services for the credit reporting and debt collection industry | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | providing education services, namely providing education classes, seminars or workshops for members and others relating to all aspects of the credit reporting and debt collection industry | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | association services, namely promoting the services of the credit reporting and debt collection industry, to promulgate policies and conduct activities, namely providing members and others with opportunities for dialogue, education, advancement and improvement relating to all aspects of the credit reporting industry, for the betterment of members of the credit reporting industry to facilitate and encourage technical cooperation between members through the development of procedures, hardware and software | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 1996 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 16, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 16, 1996 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 8, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 7, 1995 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 16, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 26, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 16, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 1995 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 15, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 12, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |